![]() ![]() Monthly is traditional, but you can do weekly too. Get a plant tour, network for jobs, learn some applications of your work, even get a consulting gig (at least in the future).A bullet journal budget spread is just a layout in your BuJo that you use to forecast your income and plan your spending & expenses for a specific time period. And honest, sometimes these interactions are more fun than a several thousand people mega conference. It will at least be an external audience. Do some "lunch talks" or the like at companies, national labs, FFRDCes, etc. Here's an idea though if you want to buff that meeting/presentation part up, but don't have the budget to go to ACS for a week. But still, it is a rational (imperfect) indicator that people look at to see how much you are a grown scientist. And yes, funding and advisor sensibility can affect this. Fine, try to travel more towards the end of your Ph.D. If anything, maybe it's a fair implication if you haven't been to any meetings, that you are not yet a full member of the community. (That's where the publications go in.) Meetings/presentations is to show that you attended and presented and interacted and learned something. I don't think that section on your CV is so much for written work. But even then, I would probably pass.Ĭonsider, do you expect to list every talk where your name is written as one of the researchers but your advisor presents the work? Even if you did the slides for him, I wouldn't bother. If you physically made the poster, maybe. However, in the short run for those looking for their first professor position, having a successful track record of your students presenting at conferences can be a good sign of being an active mentor (which can be a quality that hiring committees may value).īut again, in the long run, it may not be worth it to put it on your CV if there's no benefit to career progression. In the long run, this doesn't help them in advancing their own career (i.e., no one's going to get a lifetime achievement award for only successfully sending a bunch of undergrads to conferences). Graduate students and post-docs also often times list poster presentations that their students did on their own CVs. In this regard, the program of research is headed by you, and presumably, you played a role in the creation of the poster, so why not receive credit for it where credit is due? ![]() For instance, you can be the PI of a large project and have one of your students or research assistants go present the findings to not only give them exposure to the academic environment but also to disseminate findings without having to sacrifice money, time, and effort on your part (perhaps you don't have travel funds or have teaching obligations and can't physically make it to the conference). It can also often times be the case that the one presenting the work is not actually the one who had the lead role in the project. It can be a sign that you're active in the research community, working with collaborators on their projects, and/or disseminating findings to a wider audience than the ones who read the journal that you publish your work in, even if you're not the one who presented the findings. But if you're a graduate student or post-doc who's about to enter the job market, then I would ask the question of "why would you not?"įor junior scholars, poster sessions can have multiple implications beyond just presenting research findings. If you're a tenured professor, then it probably doesn't make much difference whether you have it on your CV or not-publications matter more anyways. I would add a bit to Buffy's answer regarding where you are in your career. As Bryan and Buffy stated, it can depend on the field and I won't go into that for my answer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |